Wednesday, August 10, 2011

There Is a Context to London's Riots that Can't Be Ignored

Nina Power
Guardian UK/CommonDreams.org
August 10, 2011.

Those condemning the events of the past couple of nights in north London and elsewhere would do well to take a step back and consider the bigger picture: a country in which the richest 10% are now 100 times better off than the poorest, where consumerism predicated on personal debt has been pushed for years as the solution to a faltering economy, and where, according to the OECD, social mobility is worse than any other developed country.

As Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett point out in The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone, phenomena usually described as "social problems" (crime, ill-health, imprisonment rates, mental illness) are far more common in unequal societies than ones with better economic distribution and less gap between the richest and the poorest. Decades of individualism, competition and state-encouraged selfishness – combined with a systematic crushing of unions and the ever-increasing criminalisation of dissent – have made Britain one of the most unequal countries in the developed world.

Images of burning buildings, cars aflame and stripped-out shops may provide spectacular fodder for a restless media, ever hungry for new stories and fresh groups to demonise, but we will understand nothing of these events if we ignore the history and the context in which they occur.

Read the entire article here. 

Comment: The closer you watch the more you realize that Darcus Howe has a point about the riots in London being an "uprising".

Penny Red has written an excellent blog post entitled "Panic on the streets of London".  See it here.

This quote from her is food for thought:
"Violence is rarely mindless. The politics of a burning building, a smashed-in shop or a young man shot by police may be obscured even to those who lit the rags or fired the gun, but the politics are there. Unquestionably there is far, far more to these riots than the death of Mark Duggan, whose shooting sparked off the unrest on Saturday, when two police cars were set alight after a five-hour vigil at Tottenham police station. A peaceful protest over the death of a man at police hands, in a community where locals have been given every reason to mistrust the forces of law and order, is one sort of political statement. Raiding shops for technology and trainers that cost ten times as much as the benefits you’re no longer entitled to is another. A co-ordinated, viral wave of civil unrest across the poorest boroughs of Britain, with young people coming from across the capital and the country to battle the police, is another."
See also Kathleen Wallace Piene's "Violence we can see" in Dissident Voice for a similar analysis.

Onward!

2 comments:

xlanxdiablox said...

if the riot is for the people, then why do we have the rioters attacking the very people they say they're fighting for? why can't they demonstrate peacefully? at this stage, the villains are no longer the government and the police, but the people themselves. in islam we believe, the ends do not justify the means. i was with them in the beginning, but not anymore. they should fight with intelligence, not pandemoniac insurgence.

Ridwan said...

xlanxdiablox thanks for adding detail and your personal experience.

I share your concern for peace toward change.

Is there a movement to counter the fallout - an alternative that does not have folks turning on each other?

Peace,
Ridwan