Thursday, December 03, 2009

Pausing

Gentle readers (all three of you ;) I am taking some time off from posting here.

The term has ended here in Mzansi and I am off to spend time with moms. Mita and I will start that journey tomorrow morning.

Thank you for reading this year.

Peace and struggle to yaz.

Ridwan

ummm Erica the Norton Commando above can fit under my tree ;)

Picture Credit

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Zapiro On Killing Bulls For Culture

Image Credit

See my post on Ukweshwama here.

Monday, November 30, 2009

"Australia's Apartheid: Return to a secret country"

by John Pilger
26 November, 2009
Newstatesman
I remember the boys dressed in army surplus, the girls in hessian, their silhouettes framed in beach shanties, staring across an abyss. You were not meant to talk about them. They were not counted in the census, unlike the sheep, and anyway were dirty and feckless and dying off.

You were not meant to disturb the surface of our great southern idyll, sun-kissed and God-blessed, in circumstances that might raise questions of race. At high school, I studied a celebrated historian, Russel Ward, who wrote: “We are civilized and they are not.” They were the first Australians. At least he mentioned them. Other text books simply left them out.

Today, almost everything has changed and has not changed. For many Aboriginal people, who value healing, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s apology last year was important. They and their white allies had worked tirelessly for the mere word to be uttered. The resistance was formidable; white supremacist politicians, journalists and academics damned the “black armband version of our history”. And when Rudd finally said it, the Sydney Morning Herald described the apology as “a piece of political wreckage” that “the Rudd government has moved quickly to clear away... in a way that responds to some of its supporters’ emotional needs”.

Australia's apartheid

There is to be no compensation for those thousands of Aborigines wrenched from their families as children, known as the stolen generation. The previous, openly racist government’s “intervention” into Aboriginal lands in the Northern Territory is being consolidated. In 2007, on the pretext that Aboriginal children were being sexually abused in “unthinkable numbers”, the government of John Howard suspended the Racial Discrimination Act and sent the army and “business managers” to take over black communities.

Within a year, barely reported statistics revealed how bogus it all was. Out of 7433 Aboriginal children examined by doctors, a maximum of four possible cases of sexual abuse were identified. The Australian Crimes Commission found no evidence of paedophile rings. What they found they already knew: poverty and sickness on the scale of Africa and India.

Since Rudd’s apology, Aboriginal poverty indicators have gone backwards. His “Closing the Gap” programme is a grim joke, having produced not a single new housing project. An undeclared agenda is straight from Australia’s colonial past: a land grab combined with an almost prurient need to control, harass and blame a people who have refused to die off, whose genius is their understanding of an ancient land that still perplexes and threatens white authority. Whenever Canberra’s politicians want to look “tough” they give the Aborigines a good kicking: it is a ritual as sacred as Don Bradman worship or Anzac Day.

The indigenous affairs minister, Jenny Macklin, has decreed that unless certain communities hand over their precious freehold leases they will be denied basic services. The Northern Territory contains abundant mineral wealth, such as uranium, and has long been eyed by multinationals as a lucrative radioactive waste dump. The blacks are in the way, yet again: so it is time for the usual feigned innocence. Rudd has said his government “doesn’t have a clear idea of what’s happening on the ground” in Aboriginal Australia. What? The reports of learned studies pour forth as if the sorcerer’s apprentice is loose. One example: the rate of incarceration of black Australians is five times that of South Africa during the last years of apartheid. The state of Western Australia imprisons Aboriginal men at eight times the apartheid figure, an Aussie world record.

On 16 November, a 12-year-old Aboriginal boy appeared in court charged with receiving a Freddo Frog chocolate bar from a friend who had allegedly taken it from a supermarket. The supermarket did not seek prosecution. Only the international headlines forced the police to drop the case. Two thirds of Aboriginal children who have contact with the police are jailed; two thirds of white children are cautioned. A young Aboriginal man was jailed for a year for stealing £12 worth of biscuits and soft drink.

A mattress in the desert

In my lifetime, Australia has become one of the most culturally diverse places on earth, and it has happened peacefully, by and large. This proud achievement fades when you drive into a country town and pass the funerals of the native people, many of them young, who take their own lives. The whispering in Antipodean hearts is race. The navy is sent against leaking boats filled with desperate refugees, Tamils, Iraqis and Afghans, and if they cannot be dumped behind razor wire somewhere in Indonesia, they are isolated on Christmas Island which, for the purpose, has been “excised” from the Australian map by a legal sleight of hand. How clever.

While I have been in Australia, Irene Khan, Amnesty’s secretary general, an experienced witness of poverty and discrimination, has been travelling through the vast outback region known as Utopia. The roads are dirt; water trickles from a single standpipe in many communities. She saw children, their eyes streaming and coughs hacking. She met Elsie, who sleeps on a mattress in the desert, yet pays rent to the government. Shocking, she says.

There is currently a liberal clarion call in Australia for a Bill of Rights, and the republican movement is stirring again. These debates are meaningless until white Australia summons the moral and political imagination to offer its first people a genuine treaty, as well as universal land rights and a proper share of the country’s resources. And respect. Only then will this fortunate society earn the respect it so often craves by other means.
On 4 November 2009, John Pilger received the Sydney Peace Prize, Australia’s international human rights award. A Secret Country, his best-selling history of Australia published 20 years ago, remains in print (Vintage Books).

Image Credit

Friday, November 27, 2009

IOL News: "Dad forced to search through dead babies"

A father has today written to the Minister of Health complaining about the treatment of his pregnant wife and how after their baby son died he had to search through 40 dead babies to find his child at Johannesburg's Coronation Hospital.
Read the rest of the article here.

Comment: This is heartbreaking! Have we become so heartless, so depraved?

Before President Zuma became president, and before he was charged with rape and then controversially acquitted, he was put in charge of what is termed "moral regeneration".

He obviously failed. In total.

Still, I wonder how much "moral regeneration" is needed in Mzansi? What will it take to bring back the idealized shine so many struggled for, and too many died for?

How many more tragedies like this before we step back and ask serious questions about our make-up?

I was shocked to read this article but not surprised.

Life in South Africa, like the state of nature Hobbes described, has become violent, brutish, and short.

Our state hospitals are in an absolute shambles. Our social services and just about every other aspect of public life is held hostage to thievery and corruption that rivals the era of white rule.

And, even while we speak of service delivery the most visible delivery has been a fast-tracking of fat-cat status to political elites who dicker over personal expense packages and million rand luxury cars.

F*ck Affirmative Action and Black Empowerment! And save me the sh*t about the white man and his racism!

We have been corrupted in total and the masses lay impoverished, still!

What 'freedom' lives and feels like this?

What's going on before we take up arms again?

Onward!

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Violence Against Women

The caption to this News24 picture reads:
SPEAKING OUT: A woman walks with her face partially covered during a march for International Day of (sic) the Elimination of Violence Against Women in Colombia. (Fernando Vergara, AP)
Resolution 54/134 (December 17, 1999) of the UN General Assembly designates November 25 as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.

Article 2 defines violence against women to include, among other forms, the following:
(a) Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including battering, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation;

(b) Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educational institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution;

(c) Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.
When South Africa held its Truth and Reconciliation hearings the issue of state sanctioned violence against women was mostly ignored.

Rape as an apartheid tool, for example, is hardly interrogated anywhere in our post-apartheid consciousness.

Can it be that the appalling levels of violence and general degradation that women continue to suffer explains some of this troubling omission?

Onward!

Ps. In South Africa a woman is killed every 6 hours by an intimate partner according to the United Nations Development Fund For Women (see their Fact Sheet for more information).

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

"Cruel Britannia: British Complicity in the Torture and Ill-treatment of Terror Suspects in Pakistan"

Human Rights Watch today released a 46 page report that documents British "complicity" in the torture of "five UK citizens of Pakistani origin ..."

Read the report here.

Read the Guardian cover article entitled 'Cruel, illegal, immoral': Human Rights Watch condemns UK's role in torture here.

Also, Eric Walberg in an article entitled Canada’s Guantanamo reports that:
Canada’s chief diplomat in Kandahar in 2006-07, Richard Colvin, who told a House of Commons committee on Afghanistan that Afghans arrested by Canadian military and handed over to Afghan authorities were knowingly tortured.
Read the rest of the article here.

Mmmmmm ... so much for the link between western-style democracy and the respect for human rights.

Onward!

South Africa Deports Israeli Airline Official

South Africa deported an Israeli airline official last week following allegations that Israel’s secret police, the Shin Bet, had infiltrated Johannesburg international airport in an effort to gather information on South African citizens, particularly black and Muslim travellers.

The move by the South African government followed an investigation by local TV showing an undercover reporter being illegally interrogated by an official with El Al, Israel’s national carrier, in a public area of Johannesburg’s OR Tambo airport.

The programme also featured testimony from Jonathan Garb, a former El Al guard, who claimed that the airline company had been a front for the Shin Bet in South Africa for many years.

Of the footage of the undercover reporter’s questioning, he commented: “Here is a secret service operating above the law in South Africa. We pull the wool over everyone’s eyes. We do exactly what we want. The local authorities do not know what we are doing.”
Read the rest of Jonathan Cook's article in Dissident Voice here.

Monday, November 23, 2009

"Encountering Ambedkar In Hungary"

By Pardeep Attri
22 November, 2009
Countercurrents.org
The Romas, a discriminated minority in Hungary, turn to Ambedkar and Buddhism in their quest for dignity and equality. Pardeep Attri journeys to Sajókaza and Budapest to find out how the Dalits and Romas connect.
Read the rest of the article here.

See this site for more information on Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (pictured above).

Onward!

Picture Credit

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Killing A Bull With Your Bare Hands In The Name Of Culture

Last week I listened to a radio interview with a man from Kwazulu-Natal who was describing and defending the First Fruits festival known as Ukweshwama.

Times columnist Fred Khumalo describes Ukweshwama as a ritual:

"... observed by people of Nguni stock, including Zulus, Swazis, and Ndebeles - which involves about 40 young men killing a bull with their bare hands.

There is a belief that the warriors inherit the bull's strength and power when the beast is killed. When the warriors salute the king upon completion of their mission, the power is transferred to the king and his kingdom.

Another explanation for the ritual is that, by killing the beast, the young warriors form a bond of trust and commitment to each other, a sentiment they then transfer to their other peers, creating a strong manhood in the kingdom in question."
Khumalo, a Zulu, goes on to argue that the practice is cruel and should not be supported simply because it is said to be a cultural right.

Ukweshwama rituals have largely been absent in South Africa in the last five or so decades.

Khumalo points out that the ritual has been revived and that its interpretation is at odds with the progress we have made as a nation.

PETA says on its website that:
"... during the festival of Ukweshwama, a group of youths torment and slaughter a terrified bull with their bare hands. They rip out the bull's tongue, shove handfuls of dirt into his mouth, tear out his eyes, and mutilate his genitals."
The man being interviewed was indignant that non-Africans, including Indian politician Maneka Gandhi who is associated with PETA, was calling on President Zuma to condemn the practice.

Just yesterday The Star (print edition) ran an opinion piece by University of Cape Town philosophy professor, David Benatar, entitled "Culture does not justify cruelty".

Like Khumalo, Benatar presses the point that just because a practice is deemed a cultural ritual does not mean it is not cruel.

Benatar is careful to explain that he views the slaughter of animals for purposes of eating as "wrong" too but he argued further that "the dismembering of a live bull is still worse and thus deserves special criticism."

I agree with Khumalo and Benatar.

Culture cannot be treated as static. Times and circumstances change and culture is not immune.

I do not expect that President Zuma, who is a Zulu, will respond to Mrs Gandhi's call. This is tricky political terrain that is best left alone or rather, ignored.

There are many insistent voices who purport to represent Africans who say that outsiders interfering with their cultural practices amounts to racism.

Nonsense is my thinking.

There is no racism in calling the act barbaric. The act is simply an outdated and cruel practice any way you slice it.

The same is true for bull fighting.

Killing a bull with your bare hands or as a sworded matador does not make you a man or brave, it just makes you a cruel f*ck and cruelty knows no skin color in these terms.

The practice should be banned and the elders of the communities concerned should sit together to figure out a more humane rites of passage ceremony.

Onward!

Picture Credit

UPDATE(November 24): Animal Rights Africa appeals to high court to stop Ukweshwama ritual.
Animal Rights Africa (ARA) will be going to the High Court in Pietermaritzburg on the 24th November 2009 to try and end the extremely cruel Ukweshwama ritual, which is due to take place on the 5th December in at Nongoma, KwaZulu-Natal, during the First Fruits Festival. Said ARA spokesperson Michele Pickover, "It physically pains us and is an affront to our dignity that an animal is made to suffer in such an overtly cruel and protracted way. "
Read the rest of the press release here.

Also, see the Mail & Guardian article(November 24) entitled "Bull-killing ritual to be debated in Durban".

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Intern Muslims ... save America!

American history is littered with constructions and reconstructions of the racialized villain(s) that stand against the ubiquitous "good guys".

I have recently been thinking how the paranoid ramblings about Islamic terrorists after the Fort Hood massacre is starting to read and feel like the same racist paranoia that led to the mass internment of Japanese Americans after the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941.

In the days after the Pearl Harbor attack racist speculation cast Japanese Americans as 'ideological instruments' and racial allies of Japan

The media joined an assortment of racist civic organizations to depict Japanese Americans as traitors who were plotting the downfall of the US.

The US government went the next step to label Japanese Americans, citizens and residents alike, as "enemy aliens".

The US then ordered that Japanese Americans living on the West Coast be rounded up and placed into "War Relocation Camps".

These camps were nothing more than concentration camps and by 1942 about 120 000 Japanese Americans had been forcefully relocated.

No formal charges were brought. The 'fact' of suspicion fueled by racist hate and lies in the US media and among its elected leaders and citizen groups was enough.

I have co-written an academic article that covers some of the tragedy I am describing here.

My co-author and I describe the fallout that led to the internment in this way:
The combination of racism fuelled by anger produced a highly volatile
situation. The consequences for Japanese Americans extended outside of the interpersonal realm into the arena of business and their professional lives.
Banks in California refused to do business with Japanese Americans. Their accounts were frozen and they were not allowed to draw any money. Japanese Americans were turned away from grocery stores, convenience stores, and other basic service providers. The state of California rescinded the certification of doctors to practice medicine and of lawyers to practice law. Japanese Americans who owned businesses lost their customers and clients. The stigma of assumed betrayal was used to deprive Japanese Americans of the right to make a living and to live without fear of reprisals from angry mobs. Hardship and uncertainty grew as Japanese Americans struggled to provide basic necessities for themselves and their families.

Political leaders throughout the country joined pressure groups that were
venting anger and calling for reprisals against Japanese Americans. Senator Tom
Stewart joined congressmen John Rankin of Mississippi and Martin Dies of Texas in
a campaign of racist rhetoric that was intended to advance their beliefs in white
supremacy. Congressman Rankin, who was notoriously known for being anti-black
and anti-semitic described World War II as a “race war” that inevitable pitted the
“white man’s civilization (against) Japanese barbarism” in a duel in which “one of
them must be destroyed.” He added that the Japanese “are pagan in their
philosophy, atheistic in their beliefs, alien in their allegiance, and antagonistic to everything for which we stand.” His comments were intended to caste suspicion
onto Japanese Americans when he said: “Once a Jap always a Jap. You cannot
change him. You cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.” Rankin’s comments
received ardent support from congressional leaders in Arkansas, Virginia, and West
Virginia.
Just this morning the disturbing themes contained in these two paragraphs replayed inside my head as I read an article in the Los Angeles Times by conservative commentator, Jennifer Rubin.

Much of Rubin's article is that there is too much "political correctness" in the argument that Islam is a peaceful religion. She presses the argument made by Cliff May of the National Review Online, that most Muslims may be peaceful but it is Islam that nonetheless fuels the violence of jihadists (whatever that term may mean).

What absolute nonsense!

Please show me anywhere in the Qur'an where Muslims are led to become jihadists.

The fact that Islam prescribes peace over war and violence as an absolute last resort is conveniently written out of the consciousness of folks like Rubin and May.

And there are so many others that are too eager to follow the course of American history and demonize away.

Take a look at the disturbing comments that accompany Rubin's article and you will get a greater appreciation of what I mean.

The falsified and racist thesis that would portray Muslims as "enemy aliens" is captured in the following comments:
YOU CANNOT SINCERELY TAKE AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AND SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIM TO BE AN OBSERVANT MUSLIM.

also;

In the words of Pogo Possum: "We have met the enemy, and he is us." At the very least, he is within our own ranks. Sacrificing the hunt for fifth columnists on the altar of political correctness does not ensure anyone's liberty or due process. It's time we root out those who intend to do us harm, and call them for what they are: enemies. Those who do not wish to be counted among their ranks need to stand up and be counted among those who are not.

and;

We have seen numerous incidents of mohammedans killing their fellow soldiers in the US Army. We have seen the majority of mohammedans keep silent rather than oppose the radicals who promote this insanity in the name of religion. Perhaps it's time for the US to rethink the notion of freedom of religion.
This last comment scratches deep to dredge up the derogatory term "mohammedans" as opposed to Muslims.

What is most striking is the constant refrain that other 'Muslims must stand up' and testify against jihadists and so they will be known.

Because, as it stands now, any law-abiding Muslim who is quiet is an enemy that wants to overthrow the "good guys".

The first comment above is most emphatic that Islam/Muslims are not compatible with the constitution (read the US).

In other words, you cannot be a Muslim and an American at the same time.

And, if you accept Rubin and May's thinking, it would be wise to remain vigilant against Islam wherever it is found, inside and outside the US.

The internment of Japanese Americans started with the seizure of assets and the freezing of bank accounts.

Last week the US started seizing assets belonging to Muslims who are allegedly tied to the government of Iran.

America it seems is yet to learn the racist folly of its ways.

I don't expect that Muslim internment camps will crop up on the mainland.

But who can reasonably argue that Guantanamo is not the 'new' internment camp, and even worse?

And what about the so called "black sites" that are spread anonymously across the globe for the purposes of containing the "enemy alien" inside and outside the imperial beast?

These are not times for complacency.

The internment of Muslims is well on its way.

Onward!