Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Poor Diet Kills 2.6 Million Infants a Year, Says Survey by Save the Children

Guardian (UK)
Simon Tisdall
February 15, 2012.

A boy is weighed in India: 48% of children in the country are reported to have 
stunted growth. Photograph: AP
Malnutrition is the root cause of the deaths of 2.6 million children each year, and the bodies and brains of 450 million more will fail to develop properly due to inadequate diet over the next 15 years unless immediate action is taken, according to a survey published on Wednesday by a leading international charity.

The survey of developing countries, A Life Free from Hunger, produced by Save the Children, estimates one in four children are already stunted because of malnutrition.

In some developing countries the figure is one in three. In India 48% of children are stunted. And in high population-growth Nigeria and Tanzania, the problem is escalating rapidly, it says.

Soaring food prices are identified as an aggravating factor. But these damaging trends can be halted and reversed using tried and tested solutions if political will exists and public awareness is raised, the report's authors say.

They urge David Cameron to use the 2012 Olympics, when dozens of heads of state will be in London, to host a "world hunger summit" and launch an international campaign to aid malnutrition victims. Campaigners also want the issue addressed at the G8 summit in Chicago in May.

Justin Forsyth, chief executive of Save the Children, said: "This is a hidden hunger crisis that could destroy the lives of nearly half a billion children unless world leaders act to stop it.

"Every hour of every day 300 children die from malnutrition-related causes simply because they don't get to eat the basic, nutritious foods that we take for granted in the UK.

"Yet solutions are clear, cheap and necessary. Not only will tackling hunger save children's lives but, at a time of economic meltdown, it will help reboot the global economy."

Overall progress had been made in recent years in reducing avoidable child deaths worldwide through immunisation and training frontline health workers, Forsyth told the Guardian. Now a big push was required on a third front, to reduce and ultimately eliminate malnutrition.

The survey, which looked at thousands of families in the developing world, says 2012 is a vital year. By mid-2013 it will already be too late to provide protection from stunting for the last generation of children who will reach their second birthday – a key nutrition milestone – by the deadline set by the UN's 2015 Millennium Development Goals.

The survey says: "Significant progress has been made in saving children's lives. The number of children not making it to their fifth birthday has fallen from 12 million in 1990 to 7.6 million in 2011.

"Momentum is building – in 2011 world leaders made critical progress on immunisation by pledging to vaccinate 250 million children by 2015, saving four million lives, and 40 countries committed to filling the 3.5 million health workers gap.

"At the same time we must accelerate efforts to improve nutrition, which holds the key to further progress."

In contrast to other areas, the survey says progress on stunting has been extremely slow. About 80% of all stunted children live in 20 of the world's poorest countries, and this has a significant impact on economic development.

Sharply rising food prices are a big negative factor. In Nigeria, it says, 94% of families cited prices as their most pressing concern and nearly a third of parents said they had taken children out of school and sent them out to work to help pay for food.

"In the past year nearly a quarter of a billion parents in countries already struggling with malnutrition have cut back on food for their families," Forsyth said.

The report said: "Malnutrition is undermining economic growth and reducing the productivity of people trying to work their way out of poverty … it's estimated that 2%-3% of national income can be lost to malnutrition. In 2010 alone malnutrition cost the world nearly £77bn."

The report quotes World Bank findings that many more families will be pushed into poverty, and will thus be less able to feed their children properly, because of the current economic downturn. The UN World Food Programme has predicted meanwhile that 24 million more children will be malnourished by 2050 as a result of climate change.

Stunting is not necessarily the result of not having enough to eat. It occurs because families cannot grow or afford nutritious food such as vegetables, milk or meat.

The analysis says: "Over half of all children in poor countries only eat three food items – staples such as cassava, which has no nutritional value at all, a pulse such as peas, and a vegetable, usually green leaves.

"This lack of nutrition leaves their bodies starved of crucial minerals, vitamins, proteins and fat, and means their brains and bodies do not develop properly.

"The impact can be devastating. If malnourished children do survive they grow up physically short, usually with lower IQs, and are much more likely to drop out of school and fail to get a job."

The survey says it could cost as little as $10bn (£6.3bn) a year to help protect 90% of the world's most vulnerable children from hunger, and calls for more food supplements, improved hygiene and increased awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding.

It also wants more and better trained health workers, social protection schemes providing a food safety net, improved global food distribution networks, and stronger, more committed political leadership.

The survey also highlights the importance of increased investment in small farms and women farmers. "Three-quarters of Africa's malnourished children live on small farms and 43% of agricultural work is carried out by women.

"Success depends on ensuring local markets are accessible and functioning, on improving education about nutrition and on investing in better research."

Read a case study of Bangladeshi girl, Rupa, here.

Comment: You can bet that the old stand-by argument of the Malthusian Dilemma will rear its head wherever fattened westerners and capitalist agents pontificate about poor children and malnutrition in the Other world.

And yet the world has the capacity to feed its population and do so in a sustainable manner (I so hate that term, perhaps humane is closer to what I mean).

Capitalism and its perpetual growth emphasis, its manufactured crises, and its non-stop wars is why we can't feed more than half the world's population an adequate diet.

Capitalism is the reason why women and children remain the most vulnerable sectors of all societies across the globe.

But even those who do not offer the outdated thinking of Malthus would nonetheless offer capital growth models to undo what capitalism sustains.

In my time in India I listened to the neo-liberal leaders talk about economic growth and market shares and putting an Indian on the moon; and all the while the streets were full of poor starving children.

How can they have faith in capitalized games when one out of two children in India is malnourished?

Here in the delusional potbellied rainbow it won't take too long to find destitute starving children foraging to make a living amidst the westernized dreams of the new capital leaders.

And every now and then when the political need arises the fat assed leadership will assemble the potbellied ruling class to talk on behalf of the impoverished masses.

And they will do so invoking Nelson Mandela whose personal fortune stands in stark contrast to the 'long walk to freedom' discourse that supposedly describes the struggle to overcome.

Mandela is not alone.  Anyone watching South African politics will know the names and faces of the potbellied class who rule in defiance of the poverty that characterizes the nation.

There can be no freedom inside of capitalism.  As long as capitalists run the world the poor will remain hungry and holding onto life by a thread of existence.

And if anyone needs an example of a state outside of mainstream neo-liberal capitalism that feeds its people despite great odds they would have to look no further than Cuba.


No comments: