June 26, 2013.
Two South African groups were trying to obtain arrest warrants for US President Barack Obama, who will visit the country later this week.
Mohamed Hussain Vawda, of the Society for the Protection of our Constitution, said he had brought charges against Obama "of war crimes and crimes against humanity".
Meanwhile, the Muslim Lawyers' Association (MLA) made an urgent application to the High Court in Pretoria on Wednesday for Obama's arrest, but the application was dismissed.
Vawda said his organisation had taken a different route to that of the MLA.
"There are so many groups of people opposing this visit... and the conduct of Mr Obama," he said.
In an affidavit stamped by the Barberton police, Vawda claimed Obama was directly and indirectly responsible for killing and injuring more than 3 000 people, including women and 176 children, in countries which "have been no threat to the US", such as Pakistan and Syria.
He accused Obama of ordering or sanctioning the use of unmanned aerial drones to kill people the US government considered a threat to the country's safety.
"These attacks are not authorised in terms of orders issued in a court of law."
Vawda said the victims were killed on the basis of "mere accusations levelled against them".
"There is no judicial oversight to determine if these persons are indeed guilty of any alleged crimes. They are deprived of a hearing. There is no accountability at all, just simple brazen murder."
Vawda claimed the targets were mainly followers of the Islamic faith, and said this amounted to genocide.
"The urgency of this matter must be dealt with seriously," he said.
He said his attorney was due to meet the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) on Wednesday to take the case further.
NPA spokeswoman Bulelwa Makeke said she was not aware of Vawda's affidavit or case.
"He has not met anyone at the NPA. We don't know about this case, we have no awareness of this".
Eyewitness News reported that, in dismissing the Muslim Lawyers' Association's (MLA) application, the High Court in Pretoria found that the case was not urgent, but did not rule on its merits.
Obama arrives in South Africa on Friday as part of a three-state Africa tour.
"We're very disappointed in the decision, and be that as it may, we remain hopeful that on review, we'll be successful," MLA spokesman Yousha Tayob told the broadcaster.
A campaign to arrest Obama for "crimes against humanity" was conducted in Ireland ahead of his visit there in May, according to the #Arrest Obama#May 22 website.
Former British prime minister Tony Blair is also the subject of an arrest campaign.
A website is offering a reward to anyone who attempts a peaceful citizen's arrest of Blair for "crimes against peace", and said it wanted to show him, among others, that "despite his requests for people to 'move on' from Iraq, the mass murder he committed will not be forgotten".
The Society for the Protection of our Constitution also sought an arrest warrant for Blair when he visited South Africa in 2012.
In November 2011, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal found Blair and former US president George W Bush guilty in absentia of crimes against humanity and genocide for their roles in the Iraq War.
The court acknowledged that the verdict was non-enforceable, but the findings were reported to the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
At the time The Daily Maverick reported that the official UK government inquiry into the Iraq War, the Chilcot Inquiry, was set to release a report late this year.
Read the original article here.
*****Comment: I am a friend of one of the MLA advocates who brought this action and I remain in awe of their demonstration of principal and determination toward justice.
For me the point has been made by the MLA even as the High Court in Pretoria ruled that the case was not urgent today.
The point is that there are enough thinking and principled people out there who know that Obama is a war criminal who should be brought to justice.
Both attempts to bring Obama to justice should be applauded even if nothing comes of either application.
The struggle to win a point of principle is often just a matter of pressing a recognition of what is right in the face of complicit power.