April 29, 2014
For the moment, a Jewish sports franchise owner is the most prominent racist in the United States. Donald Sterling’s conduct serves are a reminder that “the illusion of lockstep black-Jewish solidarity on liberal political coalition-building has long masked the reality of white Jewish privilege and investment in white supremacy.
Every Sunday for the past several years the mug of real estate mogul/slumlord and L.A. Clippers owner Donald Sterling has commanded prime ad space in the Los Angeles Times. Touting Sterling’s philanthropy, these ads often feature grinning photos of prominent African American politicians, religious leaders and other glad-handing public figures who’ve received hefty donations from his financial empire. After TMZ revealed a recording of Sterling’s racist comments about black people to girlfriend V. Stiviano, President Obama and other dignitaries were swift to condemn him. On Monday it was “shockingly” revealed that Sterling, who is Jewish, went the extra mile with his racism in the recording, contending that “the blacks are treated like dogs” in Israel to Stiviano. Responding to her criticism of this claim, Sterling reiterated that “the black Jews” are “less than” white Jews and that that is the way it should be.
Anti-black racism among white Jewish people is a seldom discussed aspect of the complicated arc of black-Jewish relations in the U.S. Yet Sterling’s comments are noteworthy because they not only highlight the white supremacist bent of Israeli anti-African sentiment but the social construction of Jewish whiteness. Echoing rancher Cliven Bundy’s recent references to blacks thriving under slavery, Sterling expressed the paternalistic view that he “supports” blacks on the team by giving them clothes, houses and cars. He then blasts Stiviano for comparing anti-black racism and discrimination to the Jewish Holocaust. Implicit in this shutdown is the notion that Jewish suffering under the Holocaust precludes consideration of how white Jews have benefited from institutional and systemic racism.
Published by Rutgers University Press (1989)
Buy at Powell's Books (Portland, Oregon)
The illusion of lockstep black-Jewish solidarity on liberal political coalition-building has long masked the reality of white Jewish privilege and investment in white supremacy. This is especially relevant to Sterling (who tellingly changed his name from Tokowitz to the more Anglicized Sterling) because he is a multi-millionaire developer who has also been the subject of two federal racial discrimination lawsuits involving tenants of color. In her book How Jews Became White Folk, Karen Brodkin notes that Jews contrasted themselves with the specter of a “mythic blackness.” Deeply ingrained racial stereotypes of shiftless, lazy, culturally pathological and mentally enslaved blacks – versus “hard working” immigrants streaming through Ellis Island in search of opportunity – have always been a subtext of the American dream. Hence, “mythic blackness” implicitly signified social dysfunction and downward mobility—i.e., the antithesis of American notions of rugged individualism and bootstraps uplift. This divide allowed Jewish, Irish and other reviled, provisionally white ethnic immigrants to highlight and capitalize on their (relative) whiteness. As Salomon Gruenwald notes in a review of Brodkin’s book, “Jews did not become white because they succeeded in spite of racism, rather, they succeeded because of white racism. Economic and social shifts following WWII reconfigured whiteness in such a way as to allow them – particularly Jewish men – the entitlements that being white brought (like the G.I. Bill and access to the suburbs).”
The long term economic legacy of these entitlements has been amplified in the post-civil rights era. African Americans of all income levels are hyper-segregated in urban communities heavily impacted by foreclosure, joblessness, predatory lending, subpar schools, racist policing and mass incarceration. And, relative to white working class homeowners, even the most wealthy African Americans are segregated into neighborhoods that have high poverty rates. As the most segregated racial group in Los Angeles, the socioeconomic divide between blacks and white Jews couldn’t be more profound. Like other European Americans in the post-World War II era, Jews took advantage of New Deal FHA, VA and GI Bill loans (which were denied to African Americans) to flee South L.A. and East L.A. neighborhoods and move to wealthier enclaves in West L.A. and the Valley. Once upon a time, predominantly Mexican American Boyle Heights was a thriving Jewish enclave. New Deal era affirmative action policies for white people, coupled with the Great Migration of African Americans from the South, facilitated white Jewish upward mobility and assimilation. As Ryan Reft writes on the transformation of Boyle Heights, “the Great Migration led others to rewrite the rules that kept whites separated from non-whites. As a result, definitions of whiteness shifted. Jews now found themselves increasingly included as part of the metropolitan area’s…conception of whiteness, and many took advantage of new housing opportunities.”
Sterling’s racist references to shiftless black untouchables are simply yet another snapshot of how caste, ethnicity and the bootstraps mythology play out in “post-racial” America. And in a country in which the racial wealth gap is most powerfully reflected in corporate real estate and apartheid-level access to private space people of color in particular shouldn’t be shocked or surprised.
Read the original article here.
Comment: Sterling's commentary on the mistreatment of blacks in Israel has been mostly invisible in the mainstream coverage.
Sikivu Hutchinson provides the needed interference above.
Sterling is a Jew and his views on blacks echoes those found among the Aryan folk who make up the KKK, for example.
How does this happen and why?
When did Jews become white in the US (and elsewhere really)?
The myth of the immigrant Jew working hard despite anti-Semitic racism to achieve the fabled American dream is largely misleading. As Salomon Gruenwald is noted as saying above:"Jews did not become white because they succeeded in spite of racism, rather, they succeeded because of white racism."
These are uncomfortable truths for some. Blackness as the deviant Other has provided a means for Jews and other so called ethnic whites to identify with Anglo-Saxon whiteness.
In so doing they have merged interests to get a significant piece of the white American pie.
This process is not unique to so called white ethnics. Hispanics or Latinos who identify as white mirror the same identity processes. And when they do a lot of folks are left wondering how a Hispanic, George Zimmerman, can kill an innocent black teenager like Trayvon Martin on the strength of white racist assumptions about black deviance and its threat to white 'well-being' and privilege(s).
In all, becoming white means that any group allowed under the whiteness umbrella must perpetuate the mythology of an inherent black/African deviance. This is the default rationalization of whiteness; white people do not exist in race terms without the demonization of black folks.
In South Africa large portions of the coloured and Indian populations reflect a similar dynamic but without becoming white in the skin sense. But that is just part of the story.
As I have argued here on the blog and elsewhere the process of being white - or becoming white - is not circumscribed by skin color. Rather, the process of being/becoming white is to be found in the ideology of whiteness and its relationship to domination - particularly via late capitalism in this epoch.
In effect, whiteness as an identity is not biological but definitively a matter of socialization impacted upon by space, place, politics and history.
What this means is that a coloured, Indian and a Jew can be anything but white in skin color or phenotype yet almost seamlessly identify and replicate the systems and privileges of whiteness.
This has led me to argue that you don't have to be white to be white.
Race and racism are complex phenomena. We would do well not to be fooled by skin-deep analysis.
And it is exactly for this reason that Sikivu Hutchinson has provided a very thoughtful - though short - article above.